Fanatical Schemes : Proslavery Rhetoric and the Tragedy of Consensus.
Material type: TextPublisher: Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press, 2010Copyright date: ©2009Description: 1 online resource (298 pages)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780817381257Subject(s): Antislavery movements -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Consensus (Social sciences) -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Fanaticism -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Politicians -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Rhetoric -- Political aspects -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Slavery -- Political aspects -- United States -- History -- 19th century | Slavery -- United States -- Justification -- History -- 19th centuryGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Fanatical Schemes : Proslavery Rhetoric and the Tragedy of ConsensusDDC classification: 973.7/1 LOC classification: E449Online resources: Click to ViewIntro -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: "Industrious in scattering the seeds of insurrection" -- 1. "Slavery shall not be discussed": The Political Power of the Irrational Rhetor -- 2. "With firm, undaunted resolution": The Rhetoric of Doom -- 3. "A deep conviction, settled on every bosom": Alarmism, Conspiracy, and Unification -- 4. "For the sake of your wives, children and their posterity": Manly Politics -- 5. "Careless of the Consequences": Extended Defenses of Slavery -- 6. "Our laws to regulate slaves are entirely founded on terror": The Political Theory of Slave Codes -- 7. "The Sweet Waters of Concord and Union": Pro slavery Rhetoric in a Deliberative Setting -- Conclusion: "Any rational plan": The Responsibilities of Rhetoric -- Notes -- Works Cited -- Index.
What was the relationship between rhetoric and slavery, and how did rhetoric fail as an alternative to violence, becoming instead its precursor?   Fanatical Schemes is a study of proslavery rhetoric in the 1830s. A common understanding of the antebellum slavery debate is that the increased stridency of abolitionists in the 1830s, particularly the abolitionist pamphlet campaign of 1835, provoked proslavery politicians into greater intransigence and inflammatory rhetoric. Patricia Roberts-Miller argues that, on the contrary, inflammatory rhetoric was inherent to proslavery ideology and predated any shift in abolitionist practices.   She examines novels, speeches, and defenses of slavery written after the pamphlet controversy to underscore the tenets of proslavery ideology and the qualities that made proslavery rhetoric effective. She also examines anti-abolitionist rhetoric in newspapers from the spring of 1835 and the history of slave codes (especially anti-literacy laws) to show that anti-abolitionism and extremist rhetoric long preceded more strident abolitionist activity in the 1830s.   The consensus that was achieved by proslavery advocates, argues Roberts-Miller, was not just about slavery, nor even simply about race. It was also about manhood, honor, authority, education, and political action. In the end, proslavery activists worked to keep the realm of public discourse from being a place in which dominant points of view could be criticized--an achievement that was, paradoxically, both a rhetorical success and a tragedy.
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2018. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
There are no comments on this title.