TY - BOOK AU - Chalk,Peter AU - Rosenau,William AU - Wachs,Mr Martin TI - Confronting "the Enemy Within": Security Intelligence, the Police, and Counterterrorism in Four Democracies SN - 9780833036148 AV - HV6431 -- .C443 2004eb U1 - 363.32 PY - 2004/// CY - Santa Monica PB - RAND Corporation, The KW - Australian Security Intelligence Organization KW - Canadian Security Intelligence Service KW - France. -- Direction de la surveillance du territoire KW - Great Britain. -- MI5 KW - Intelligence service -- Cross-cultural studies KW - Internal security -- Cross-cultural studies KW - Terrorism -- Prevention -- Cross-cultural studies KW - Electronic books N1 - Cover -- Preface -- The RAND Corporation Quality Assurance Process -- Contents -- Table -- Summary -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Chapter One - Introduction -- Chapter Two - Security Intelligence in the United Kingdom -- The Terrorist Threat -- The Security Service ("MI5") -- MI5 and the Police -- MI5 Oversight and Accountability -- Chapter Three - Security Intelligence in France -- The Terrorist Threat -- La Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire -- The DST and the Police -- DST Oversight and Accountability -- Chapter Four - Security Intelligence in Canada -- The Terrorist Threat -- The Canadian Security Intelligence Service -- CSIS and the Police -- CSIS Oversight and Accountability -- Chapter Five - Security Intelligence in Australia -- The Terrorist Threat -- The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation -- ASIO and the Police -- ASIO Oversight and Accountability -- Chapter Six - Assessment and Observations -- Strengths -- Weaknesses -- Operational Effectiveness and Acceptability -- Information Dissemination -- Accountability -- Chapter Seven - Conclusion -- Appendix - The Australian Security Intelligence OrganisationLegislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act, 2003:Background Information -- Bibliography -- About the Authors N2 - Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, critics have charged that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, while qualified to investigate terrorist incidents after the fact, is not well equipped enough to adequately gather and assess information to prevent attacks. More intrinsically, many believe that given a predominant and deeply rooted law enforcement and prosecutorial culture, the bureau may not be able to change operational focus toward dedicated counterterrorism intelligence gathering and analysis. To better inform debate, researchers analyzed the domestic security structures of four allied countries--the United Kingdom, France, Canada, and Australia--weighing both their positive and negative aspects. (PW/PC) UR - https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/buse-ebooks/detail.action?docID=197450 ER -