Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy : Post-Foundationalism and Political Liberalism.

By: Wingenbach, EdContributor(s): Breen, Dr Keith | Bulley, Dr Dan | McManus, Dr SusanMaterial type: TextTextSeries: Rethinking Political and International Theory SerPublisher: Farnham : Routledge, 2011Copyright date: ©2013Edition: 1st edDescription: 1 online resource (238 pages)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781409403548Subject(s): Democracy -- Philosophy | Political science -- PhilosophyGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy : Post-Foundationalism and Political LiberalismDDC classification: 361.650973 LOC classification: JC423 -- .W479 2011ebOnline resources: Click to View
Contents:
Cover -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Part I Post-Foundationalism and Agonistic Democratic Theory -- 1 Post-Foundational Politics and Democracy -- 2 Agonism and Democracy -- 3 A Typology of Agonistic Democracy -- 4 Agonistic Democracy and the Question of Institutions -- Part II Evaluating the Institutional Possibilities for Agonistic Democracy -- 5 Agonistic Democracy and the Limits of Popular Participation -- 6 Populism, Representation, and the Popular Will -- 7 Political Liberalism, Contingency, and Agonistic Pluralism -- 8 Liberalism, Agonism, and Democracy -- Bibliography -- Index.
Summary: The first book length study of agonism as a mature account of democratic politics, Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy provides a lucid overview of agonistic democratic theories and demonstrates the viability of this approach for institutional politics. Situating agonistic democracy within and against debates about radical democracy, foundationalism, liberal democracy, and pluralism, Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy engages the texts of Mouffe, Connolly, Ranciere, Tully, Honig, Owen, and others to fully map the contours of agonistic democratic theories. Organizing this diverse literature into a coherent typology enables sophisticated analysis of the assumptions, distinctions, and aspirations of the often conflicting theoretical positions gathered within the constellation of agonistic democratic theory. Using this framework to explore the concrete institutional possibilities appropriate to agonistic democracy, Wingenbach argues that a modified version of Rawlsian political liberalism describes the institutional conditions most likely to sustain agonistic political practices. Once shorn of metaphysical commitments and detached from aspirations to consensus, political liberalism offers a contingent and historically viable framework within which agonistic contestation can occur. Such a reinterpretation of Rawls produces not the sublimation of agonism but a transformation of liberalism, so that it more adequately accommodates the deep pluralism of the post-foundational condition.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Cover -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- Part I Post-Foundationalism and Agonistic Democratic Theory -- 1 Post-Foundational Politics and Democracy -- 2 Agonism and Democracy -- 3 A Typology of Agonistic Democracy -- 4 Agonistic Democracy and the Question of Institutions -- Part II Evaluating the Institutional Possibilities for Agonistic Democracy -- 5 Agonistic Democracy and the Limits of Popular Participation -- 6 Populism, Representation, and the Popular Will -- 7 Political Liberalism, Contingency, and Agonistic Pluralism -- 8 Liberalism, Agonism, and Democracy -- Bibliography -- Index.

The first book length study of agonism as a mature account of democratic politics, Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy provides a lucid overview of agonistic democratic theories and demonstrates the viability of this approach for institutional politics. Situating agonistic democracy within and against debates about radical democracy, foundationalism, liberal democracy, and pluralism, Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy engages the texts of Mouffe, Connolly, Ranciere, Tully, Honig, Owen, and others to fully map the contours of agonistic democratic theories. Organizing this diverse literature into a coherent typology enables sophisticated analysis of the assumptions, distinctions, and aspirations of the often conflicting theoretical positions gathered within the constellation of agonistic democratic theory. Using this framework to explore the concrete institutional possibilities appropriate to agonistic democracy, Wingenbach argues that a modified version of Rawlsian political liberalism describes the institutional conditions most likely to sustain agonistic political practices. Once shorn of metaphysical commitments and detached from aspirations to consensus, political liberalism offers a contingent and historically viable framework within which agonistic contestation can occur. Such a reinterpretation of Rawls produces not the sublimation of agonism but a transformation of liberalism, so that it more adequately accommodates the deep pluralism of the post-foundational condition.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2018. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha