Equivocal Beings : Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s--Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen.

By: Johnson, Claudia LContributor(s): Wollstonecraft, Mary | Radcliffe, AnnMaterial type: TextTextSeries: Women in Culture and SocietyPublisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1995Copyright date: ©1995Description: 1 online resource (256 pages)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780226401799Subject(s): Austen, Jane, -- 1775-1817 -- Criticism and interpretation | Burney, Fanny, -- 1752-1840 -- Criticism and interpretation | English fiction -- Women authors -- History and criticism | Politics and literature -- Great Britain -- History -- 18th century | Radcliffe, Ann Ward, -- 1764-1823 -- Criticism and interpretation | Wollstonecraft, Mary, -- 1759-1797 -- Criticism and interpretation | Women and literature -- Great Britain -- History -- 18th centuryGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Equivocal Beings : Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s--Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, AustenDDC classification: 823/.6099287 LOC classification: PR858Online resources: Click to View
Contents:
Contents -- Foreword by Catharine R. Stimpson -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Introduction: The Age of Chivalry and the Crisis of Gender -- Part One: Mary Wollstonecraft -- 1 The Distinction of the Sexes: The Vindications -- 2 Embodying the Sentiments: Mary and The Wrongs of Woman -- Part Two: Ann Radcliffe -- 3 Less than Man and More than Woman: The Romance of the Forest -- 4 The Sex of Suffering: The Mysteries of Udolpho -- 5 Losing the Mother in the Judge: The Italian -- Part Three: Frances Burney -- 6 Statues, Idiots, Automatons: Camilla -- 7 Vindicating the Wrongs of Woman: The Wanderer -- Afterward: Jane Austen -- "Not at all what a man should be!": Remaking English Manhood in Emma -- Notes -- Index.
Summary: In the wake of the French Revolution, Edmund Burke argued that civil order depended upon nurturing the sensibility of men-upon the masculine cultivation of traditionally feminine qualities such as sentiment, tenderness, veneration, awe, gratitude, and even prejudice. Writers as diverse as Sterne, Goldsmith, Burke, and Rousseau were politically motivated to represent authority figures as men of feeling, but denied women comparable authority by representing their feelings as inferior, pathological, or criminal. Focusing on Mary Wollstonecraft, Ann Radcliffe, Frances Burney, and Jane Austen, whose popular works culminate and assail this tradition, Claudia L. Johnson examines the legacy male sentimentality left for women of various political persuasions. Demonstrating the interrelationships among politics, gender, and feeling in the fiction of this period, Johnson provides detailed readings of Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, and Burney, and treats the qualities that were once thought to mar their work-grotesqueness, strain, and excess-as indices of ideological conflict and as strategies of representation during a period of profound political conflict. She maintains that the reactionary reassertion of male sentimentality as a political duty displaced customary gender roles, rendering women, in Wollstonecraft's words, "equivocal beings.".
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Contents -- Foreword by Catharine R. Stimpson -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Introduction: The Age of Chivalry and the Crisis of Gender -- Part One: Mary Wollstonecraft -- 1 The Distinction of the Sexes: The Vindications -- 2 Embodying the Sentiments: Mary and The Wrongs of Woman -- Part Two: Ann Radcliffe -- 3 Less than Man and More than Woman: The Romance of the Forest -- 4 The Sex of Suffering: The Mysteries of Udolpho -- 5 Losing the Mother in the Judge: The Italian -- Part Three: Frances Burney -- 6 Statues, Idiots, Automatons: Camilla -- 7 Vindicating the Wrongs of Woman: The Wanderer -- Afterward: Jane Austen -- "Not at all what a man should be!": Remaking English Manhood in Emma -- Notes -- Index.

In the wake of the French Revolution, Edmund Burke argued that civil order depended upon nurturing the sensibility of men-upon the masculine cultivation of traditionally feminine qualities such as sentiment, tenderness, veneration, awe, gratitude, and even prejudice. Writers as diverse as Sterne, Goldsmith, Burke, and Rousseau were politically motivated to represent authority figures as men of feeling, but denied women comparable authority by representing their feelings as inferior, pathological, or criminal. Focusing on Mary Wollstonecraft, Ann Radcliffe, Frances Burney, and Jane Austen, whose popular works culminate and assail this tradition, Claudia L. Johnson examines the legacy male sentimentality left for women of various political persuasions. Demonstrating the interrelationships among politics, gender, and feeling in the fiction of this period, Johnson provides detailed readings of Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, and Burney, and treats the qualities that were once thought to mar their work-grotesqueness, strain, and excess-as indices of ideological conflict and as strategies of representation during a period of profound political conflict. She maintains that the reactionary reassertion of male sentimentality as a political duty displaced customary gender roles, rendering women, in Wollstonecraft's words, "equivocal beings.".

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2018. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha