Causes and Consequences of Word Structure.

By: Hay, JenniferMaterial type: TextTextSeries: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics SerPublisher: Florence : Routledge, 2003Copyright date: ©2003Edition: 1st edDescription: 1 online resource (257 pages)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780203495131Subject(s): Grammar, Comparative and general -- Morphology | Speech perceptionGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Causes and Consequences of Word StructureDDC classification: 414 LOC classification: P241 -- .H39 2003ebOnline resources: Click to View
Contents:
Cover -- Causes and Consequences of word Structure -- Copyright -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Modeling Speech Perception -- 1.2 Modeling Morphological Processing -- 1.3 Lexical Effects -- 1.3.1 Phonological Transparency -- 1.3.2 Temporality -- 1.3.3 Relative Frequency -- 1.4 Prelexical Effects -- 1.4.1 Metrical Structure -- 1.4.2 Possible Word Constraint -- 1.4.3 Probabilistic Phonotactics -- 1.5 Consequences -- 1.5.1 Words -- 1.5.2 Affixes -- 1.6 Some Disclaimers -- 1.7 Organization of the Book -- 2. Phonotactics and Morphology in Speech Perception -- 2.1 Phonotactics in Speech Perception -- 2.2 Neural Networks and Segmentation -- 2.3 Experiment 1: a Simple Recurrent Network -- 2.3.1 Network Architecture -- 2.3.2 Training Data -- 2.3.3 Results and Discussion -- 2.4 Phonotactics and Morphological Decomposition -- 2.5 Experiment 2: Phonotactic Decomposition in Morphology -- 2.5.1 Materials -- 2.5.2 Methodology -- 2.5.3 Results and Discussion -- 2.6 Summary -- 3. Phonotactics and the Lexicon -- 3.1 Experiment 3: Phonotactics and Morphological Complexity -- 3.1.1 Materials and Methodology -- 3.1.2 Results and Discussion -- 3.2 Calculating Juncturehood -- 3.3 Prefixes -- 3.3.1 Prefixedness -- 3.3.2 Semantics -- Semantic Transparency Ratings: Wurm (1997) -- Polysemy -- Degree of Semantic Drift -- 3.3.3 Lexical Frequency -- 3.4 Suffixes -- 3.4.1 Semantics -- Degree of Semantic Drift -- Polysemy -- 3.4.2 Lexical Frequency -- 3.4.3 Summary: Suffixes and Junctural Phonotactics -- 3.5 Summary -- 4. Relative Frequency and Morphological Decomposition -- 4.1 Relative Frequency in Morphology -- 4.2 Surface Frequency and Decomposition -- 4.3 Base Frequency and Decomposition -- 4.4 Models of Morphological Processing -- 4.4.1 Bybee's "morphology as Connections" Model.
4.4.2 Caramazza's "augmented Addressed Morphology" -- 4.4.3 Marslen-wilson's "direct Access Model" -- 4.4.4 Baayen(1992) -- 4.4.5 Frauenfelder and Schreuder (1992) -- 4.4.6 Schreuder and Baayen's Morphological Meta-model -- 4.4.7 Summary -- 4.5 Experiment 4: Relative Frequency and Morphological Complexity -- 4.5.1 Materials and Methodology -- 4.5.2 Results and Discussion -- 4.6 Experiment 5: Relative Frequency and Pitch Accent Placement -- 4.6.1 Materials and Methodology -- 4.6.2 Results -- 4.6.3 Discussion -- 4.7 Summary -- 5. Relative Frequency and the Lexicon -- 5.1 Relative Frequency Distributions in Affixed Words -- 5.2 Relative Frequency in Prefixed Forms -- 5.2.1 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Prefixed Forms -- 5.2.2 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift of Prefixed Forms -- 5.3 Relative Frequency in Suffixed Forms -- 5.3.1 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift in Suffixed Forms -- 5.3.2 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Suffixed Forms -- 5.4 Summary -- 5.5 Consequences -- 6. Relative Frequency and Phonetic Implementation -- 6.1 Experiment 6: Relative Frequency and /tadeletion -- 6.1.1 Materials -- 6.1.2 Measurement and Analysis -- 6.1.3 Results and Discussion -- 6.2 Discussion -- 7. Morphological Productivity -- 7.1 Measuring Productivity -- 7.2 Modeling Productivity -- 7.2.1 Productivity and Morphological Decomposition -- 8. Affix Ordering -- 8.1 a Parsing Account -- 8.2 Hypotheses -- 8.2.1 the Same Suffix Will Be Differently Separable in Individual Words Depending on the Phonotactics -- 8.2.2 the Same Suffix Will Be Differently Separable in Individual Words Depending on the Frequency -- 8.2.3 Suffixes Beginning with Consonants Will Tend to Be More Separable Than Suffixes Beginning with Vowels.
8.2.4 Suffixes Represented by a Relatively High Proportion of Words Which Are Less Frequent Than Their Bases Will Tend to Be More Separable Than Suffixes Represented by a Relatively Low Proportion of Words Which Are Less Frequent Than Their Bases -- 8.2.5 More Separable Affixes Will Occur Outside Less Separable Affixes -- 8.3 Frequency and Phonotactic Profiles of Level 1 and 2 Affixes -- 8.4 Fabb's (1988) Affix Classes -- 8.4.1 Suffixes Which Never Attach to an Already Suffixed Word -- 8.4.2 Suffixes Which Attach Outside One Other Suffix -- 8.4.3 Freely Attaching Suffixes -- 8.4.4 Problematic Suffixes -- 8.5 a Case Study: Denominal -al -- 8.6 Experiment 7a: -al Affixation and Relative Frequency -- 8.6.1 Methodology and Materials -- 8.6.2 Results -- 8.7 Experiment 7b: -al Affixation and Phonotactics -- 8.7.1 Methodology and Materials -- 8.7.2 Results -- 8.8 Discussion -- 8.9 Exceptions to Level-ordering -- 8.10bracketing Paradoxes -- 8.11 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- 9.1 Summary of Results -- 9.1.1 Probabilistic Phonotactics -- 9.1.2 Lexical Frequency -- 9.1.3 Phonetic Consequences -- 9.1.4 Morphological Productivity -- 9.1.5 Level-ordering and Stacking Restrictions -- 9.2 Discussion -- Appendix A. Segmentation and Statistics -- A.l Interactionist Vs. Bottom-up Models of Segmentation -- A.2 Reanalysis of Hay Et Al. (in Press) -- A.3 Experiment 2 (2.5) -- A.4 Wurm: Prefixedness (3.3.1) -- A.5 Wurm: Semantic Transparency (3.3.2) -- A.6 Polysemy (3.3.2) -- A.7 Relative Frequency (3.3.3) -- A. 8 Segmentation and Language Design -- References -- Index.
Summary: First published in 2003. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Cover -- Causes and Consequences of word Structure -- Copyright -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Modeling Speech Perception -- 1.2 Modeling Morphological Processing -- 1.3 Lexical Effects -- 1.3.1 Phonological Transparency -- 1.3.2 Temporality -- 1.3.3 Relative Frequency -- 1.4 Prelexical Effects -- 1.4.1 Metrical Structure -- 1.4.2 Possible Word Constraint -- 1.4.3 Probabilistic Phonotactics -- 1.5 Consequences -- 1.5.1 Words -- 1.5.2 Affixes -- 1.6 Some Disclaimers -- 1.7 Organization of the Book -- 2. Phonotactics and Morphology in Speech Perception -- 2.1 Phonotactics in Speech Perception -- 2.2 Neural Networks and Segmentation -- 2.3 Experiment 1: a Simple Recurrent Network -- 2.3.1 Network Architecture -- 2.3.2 Training Data -- 2.3.3 Results and Discussion -- 2.4 Phonotactics and Morphological Decomposition -- 2.5 Experiment 2: Phonotactic Decomposition in Morphology -- 2.5.1 Materials -- 2.5.2 Methodology -- 2.5.3 Results and Discussion -- 2.6 Summary -- 3. Phonotactics and the Lexicon -- 3.1 Experiment 3: Phonotactics and Morphological Complexity -- 3.1.1 Materials and Methodology -- 3.1.2 Results and Discussion -- 3.2 Calculating Juncturehood -- 3.3 Prefixes -- 3.3.1 Prefixedness -- 3.3.2 Semantics -- Semantic Transparency Ratings: Wurm (1997) -- Polysemy -- Degree of Semantic Drift -- 3.3.3 Lexical Frequency -- 3.4 Suffixes -- 3.4.1 Semantics -- Degree of Semantic Drift -- Polysemy -- 3.4.2 Lexical Frequency -- 3.4.3 Summary: Suffixes and Junctural Phonotactics -- 3.5 Summary -- 4. Relative Frequency and Morphological Decomposition -- 4.1 Relative Frequency in Morphology -- 4.2 Surface Frequency and Decomposition -- 4.3 Base Frequency and Decomposition -- 4.4 Models of Morphological Processing -- 4.4.1 Bybee's "morphology as Connections" Model.

4.4.2 Caramazza's "augmented Addressed Morphology" -- 4.4.3 Marslen-wilson's "direct Access Model" -- 4.4.4 Baayen(1992) -- 4.4.5 Frauenfelder and Schreuder (1992) -- 4.4.6 Schreuder and Baayen's Morphological Meta-model -- 4.4.7 Summary -- 4.5 Experiment 4: Relative Frequency and Morphological Complexity -- 4.5.1 Materials and Methodology -- 4.5.2 Results and Discussion -- 4.6 Experiment 5: Relative Frequency and Pitch Accent Placement -- 4.6.1 Materials and Methodology -- 4.6.2 Results -- 4.6.3 Discussion -- 4.7 Summary -- 5. Relative Frequency and the Lexicon -- 5.1 Relative Frequency Distributions in Affixed Words -- 5.2 Relative Frequency in Prefixed Forms -- 5.2.1 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Prefixed Forms -- 5.2.2 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift of Prefixed Forms -- 5.3 Relative Frequency in Suffixed Forms -- 5.3.1 Relative Frequency and Semantic Drift in Suffixed Forms -- 5.3.2 Relative Frequency and Polysemy in Suffixed Forms -- 5.4 Summary -- 5.5 Consequences -- 6. Relative Frequency and Phonetic Implementation -- 6.1 Experiment 6: Relative Frequency and /tadeletion -- 6.1.1 Materials -- 6.1.2 Measurement and Analysis -- 6.1.3 Results and Discussion -- 6.2 Discussion -- 7. Morphological Productivity -- 7.1 Measuring Productivity -- 7.2 Modeling Productivity -- 7.2.1 Productivity and Morphological Decomposition -- 8. Affix Ordering -- 8.1 a Parsing Account -- 8.2 Hypotheses -- 8.2.1 the Same Suffix Will Be Differently Separable in Individual Words Depending on the Phonotactics -- 8.2.2 the Same Suffix Will Be Differently Separable in Individual Words Depending on the Frequency -- 8.2.3 Suffixes Beginning with Consonants Will Tend to Be More Separable Than Suffixes Beginning with Vowels.

8.2.4 Suffixes Represented by a Relatively High Proportion of Words Which Are Less Frequent Than Their Bases Will Tend to Be More Separable Than Suffixes Represented by a Relatively Low Proportion of Words Which Are Less Frequent Than Their Bases -- 8.2.5 More Separable Affixes Will Occur Outside Less Separable Affixes -- 8.3 Frequency and Phonotactic Profiles of Level 1 and 2 Affixes -- 8.4 Fabb's (1988) Affix Classes -- 8.4.1 Suffixes Which Never Attach to an Already Suffixed Word -- 8.4.2 Suffixes Which Attach Outside One Other Suffix -- 8.4.3 Freely Attaching Suffixes -- 8.4.4 Problematic Suffixes -- 8.5 a Case Study: Denominal -al -- 8.6 Experiment 7a: -al Affixation and Relative Frequency -- 8.6.1 Methodology and Materials -- 8.6.2 Results -- 8.7 Experiment 7b: -al Affixation and Phonotactics -- 8.7.1 Methodology and Materials -- 8.7.2 Results -- 8.8 Discussion -- 8.9 Exceptions to Level-ordering -- 8.10bracketing Paradoxes -- 8.11 Conclusion -- 9. Conclusion -- 9.1 Summary of Results -- 9.1.1 Probabilistic Phonotactics -- 9.1.2 Lexical Frequency -- 9.1.3 Phonetic Consequences -- 9.1.4 Morphological Productivity -- 9.1.5 Level-ordering and Stacking Restrictions -- 9.2 Discussion -- Appendix A. Segmentation and Statistics -- A.l Interactionist Vs. Bottom-up Models of Segmentation -- A.2 Reanalysis of Hay Et Al. (in Press) -- A.3 Experiment 2 (2.5) -- A.4 Wurm: Prefixedness (3.3.1) -- A.5 Wurm: Semantic Transparency (3.3.2) -- A.6 Polysemy (3.3.2) -- A.7 Relative Frequency (3.3.3) -- A. 8 Segmentation and Language Design -- References -- Index.

First published in 2003. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2018. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha