Fiscal Policy as an Instrument of Investment and Growth [electronic resource] / Basu, Kaushik

By: Basu, KaushikContributor(s): Basu, KaushikMaterial type: TextTextPublication details: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2014Description: 1 online resource (19 p.)Subject(s): Access to Finance | Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress | Debt Markets | Economic Growth | Emerging Markets | Finance and Financial Sector Development | Fiscal Guarantees | Infrastructure Investment | Monetary Policy | Non Bank Financial Institutions | Private Sector | Private Sector DevelopmentAdditional physical formats: Basu, Kaushik: Fiscal Policy as an Instrument of Investment and Growth.Online resources: Click here to access online Abstract: This paper investigates the role of fiscal guarantees in promoting infrastructure investment. Infrastructure is a critical driver of economic growth, but infrastructure entails significant up-front costs that yield benefits after a time lag. Investors hesitate to put their money down on private infrastructure ventures because of the long lag and governments do not give guarantees for reasons of fiscal prudence. The paper argues that governments and large investment guarantee agencies can in many situations give suitably-calibrated guarantees to private projects by exploiting the fact that a guarantee on one project can reduce the risk of another one failing. The paper works out the architecture of such guarantees, which can be fiscally prudent and yet boost investment, especially in infrastructure, and thereby promote growth.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

This paper investigates the role of fiscal guarantees in promoting infrastructure investment. Infrastructure is a critical driver of economic growth, but infrastructure entails significant up-front costs that yield benefits after a time lag. Investors hesitate to put their money down on private infrastructure ventures because of the long lag and governments do not give guarantees for reasons of fiscal prudence. The paper argues that governments and large investment guarantee agencies can in many situations give suitably-calibrated guarantees to private projects by exploiting the fact that a guarantee on one project can reduce the risk of another one failing. The paper works out the architecture of such guarantees, which can be fiscally prudent and yet boost investment, especially in infrastructure, and thereby promote growth.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha