Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay [electronic resource] / Marisa Bucheli

By: Bucheli, MarisaContributor(s): Amabile, Florencia | Bucheli, Marisa | Lustig, Nora | Rossi, MaximoMaterial type: TextTextPublication details: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2013Description: 1 online resource (41 p.)Subject(s): Debt Markets | Economic Theory & Research | Emerging Markets | Incidence | Inequality | Macroeconomics and Economic Growth | Poverty | Rural Poverty Reduction | Services & Transfers to Poor | Social spending | Taxes | UruguayAdditional physical formats: Bucheli, Marisa: Social Spending, Taxes and Income Redistribution in Uruguay.Online resources: Click here to access online Abstract: How much redistribution does Uruguay accomplish through social spending and taxes? How progressive are revenue collection and social spending? A standard fiscal incidence analysis shows that Uruguay achieves a nontrivial reduction in inequality and poverty when all taxes and transfers are combined. In comparison with five other countries in Latin America, it ranks first (poverty reduction) and second (inequality reduction), and first in terms of poverty reduction effectiveness and third in terms of overall (including transfers in-kind) inequality reduction effectiveness. Direct taxes are progressive and indirect taxes are regressive. Social spending on direct transfers, contributory pensions, education and health is quite progressive in absolute terms except for tertiary education, which is almost neutral in relative terms.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

How much redistribution does Uruguay accomplish through social spending and taxes? How progressive are revenue collection and social spending? A standard fiscal incidence analysis shows that Uruguay achieves a nontrivial reduction in inequality and poverty when all taxes and transfers are combined. In comparison with five other countries in Latin America, it ranks first (poverty reduction) and second (inequality reduction), and first in terms of poverty reduction effectiveness and third in terms of overall (including transfers in-kind) inequality reduction effectiveness. Direct taxes are progressive and indirect taxes are regressive. Social spending on direct transfers, contributory pensions, education and health is quite progressive in absolute terms except for tertiary education, which is almost neutral in relative terms.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha