Pollution Charges, Community Pressure, and Abatement Cost of Industrial Pollution in China [electronic resource] / Wang, Hua

By: Wang, HuaContributor(s): Wang, HuaMaterial type: TextTextPublication details: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 1999Description: 1 online resource (32 p.)Subject(s): Abatement | Brown Issues and Health | Demand | Empirical Analysis | Empirical Studies | Environment | Environmental | Environmental Economics and Policies | Environmental Protection | Environmental Sciences | Green Issues | Incentives | Industrial Water | Industry | Marginal Abatement | Pollution | Pollution Abatement | Pollution Charges | Pollution Control | Pollution Discharge | Prices | Public Sector Development | Regulation | Standards | Water | Water and Industry | Water Pollution | Water ResourcesAdditional physical formats: Wang, Hua.: Pollution Charges, Community Pressure, and Abatement Cost of Industrial Pollution in China.Online resources: Click here to access online Abstract: May 2000 - Community pressure may be as strong an incentive for industrial firms to control pollution in China as pollution levies are. Wang evaluates the strength of the effect that community pressure and pollution charges have on industrial pollution control in China and estimates the marginal cost of pollution abatement. He examines a well-documented set of plant-level data, combined with community-level data, to assess the impact of pollution charges and community pressure on industrial behavior in China. He constructs and estimates an industrial organic water pollution discharge model for plants that violate standards for pollution discharge, pay pollution charges, and are constantly under community pressure to further abate pollution. He creates a model and estimates implicit prices for pollution discharges from community pressure, which are determined jointly by the explicit price, the pollution levy. He finds that the implicit discharge price is at least as high as the explicit price. In other words, community pressure not only exists but may be as strong an incentive as the pollution charge is for industrial firms to control pollution in China. Wang's modeling approach also provides a way to estimate the marginal cost of pollution abatement. The empirical results show that the current marginal cost of abatement is about twice the effective charge rate in China. This paper - a product of Infrastructure and Environment, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study environmental regulation in developing countries. The author may be contacted at hwang1@worldbank.org.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

May 2000 - Community pressure may be as strong an incentive for industrial firms to control pollution in China as pollution levies are. Wang evaluates the strength of the effect that community pressure and pollution charges have on industrial pollution control in China and estimates the marginal cost of pollution abatement. He examines a well-documented set of plant-level data, combined with community-level data, to assess the impact of pollution charges and community pressure on industrial behavior in China. He constructs and estimates an industrial organic water pollution discharge model for plants that violate standards for pollution discharge, pay pollution charges, and are constantly under community pressure to further abate pollution. He creates a model and estimates implicit prices for pollution discharges from community pressure, which are determined jointly by the explicit price, the pollution levy. He finds that the implicit discharge price is at least as high as the explicit price. In other words, community pressure not only exists but may be as strong an incentive as the pollution charge is for industrial firms to control pollution in China. Wang's modeling approach also provides a way to estimate the marginal cost of pollution abatement. The empirical results show that the current marginal cost of abatement is about twice the effective charge rate in China. This paper - a product of Infrastructure and Environment, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study environmental regulation in developing countries. The author may be contacted at hwang1@worldbank.org.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha