How much should I hold? Reserve Adequacy in Emerging Markets and Small Islands [electronic resource] / Nkunde Mwase.
Material type: TextSeries: IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 12/205Publication details: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2012Description: 1 online resource (44 p.)ISBN: 1475505558 :ISSN: 1018-5941Subject(s): Balance of Payments | Comparative Studies of Countries | Current Account | Deleveraging | Econometric Methods: Multiple/Simultaneous Equation Models | Exchange Rate Regimes | Comoros | Dominican Republic | Sri LankaAdditional physical formats: Print Version:: How much should I hold? Reserve Adequacy in Emerging Markets and Small IslandsOnline resources: IMF e-Library | IMF Book Store Abstract: This paper investigates the drivers of reserves in emerging markets (EMs) and small island (SIs) and develops an operational metric for estimating reserves in SIs taking into account their unique characteristics. It uses quantile regression techniques to allow the estimated factors driving reserves holdings to vary along the reserves' holding distribution and tests for equality among the slope coefficients of the various quantile regressions and the overall models. F-tests comparing the inter-quantile differences could not reject the that the models for the different quantiles of SIs reserve distribution were similar but this was rejected for EMs distribution suggesting that models explaining drivers of reserve holdings should take into account the country's reserve holdings. Empirical analysis suggests that the metric performs better than existing metrics in reducing crisis probabilities in SIs.This paper investigates the drivers of reserves in emerging markets (EMs) and small island (SIs) and develops an operational metric for estimating reserves in SIs taking into account their unique characteristics. It uses quantile regression techniques to allow the estimated factors driving reserves holdings to vary along the reserves' holding distribution and tests for equality among the slope coefficients of the various quantile regressions and the overall models. F-tests comparing the inter-quantile differences could not reject the that the models for the different quantiles of SIs reserve distribution were similar but this was rejected for EMs distribution suggesting that models explaining drivers of reserve holdings should take into account the country's reserve holdings. Empirical analysis suggests that the metric performs better than existing metrics in reducing crisis probabilities in SIs.
Description based on print version record.
There are no comments on this title.