Trade Issues in the Doha Round [electronic resource] : Dispelling Some Misconceptions / Stephen Tokarick.
Material type: TextSeries: IMF Policy Discussion Papers; Policy Discussion Paper ; No. 06/04Publication details: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2006Description: 1 online resource (24 p.)ISBN: 1451946163 :ISSN: 1934-7456Subject(s): Export Subsidies | Neoclassical Models of Trade | Preference Erosion | Preference Schemes | Tariff Reductions | United StatesAdditional physical formats: Print Version:: Trade Issues in the Doha Round : Dispelling Some MisconceptionsOnline resources: IMF e-Library | IMF Book Store Abstract: The current round of multilateral trade negotiations-the Doha Round-presents an opportunity for countries to reap the benefits of trade liberalization. Unfortunately, a number of misconceptions about the likely impact of trade reforms has, in part, impeded more rapid progress toward completion of the Round. This paper addresses some of the most egregious of these misconceptions and presents results from IMF research that sheds light on these issues. In particular, this paper argues that: (i) developing countries have much to gain from their own trade liberalization; (ii) preference erosion could be significant for some countries, but it is not a justification for postponing tariff reductions; (iii) tariffs applied against agricultural products in rich countries actually harm developing countries more than subsidies; and (iv) a disproportionate share of agricultural subsidies in rich countries goes to large wealthy farmers.The current round of multilateral trade negotiations-the Doha Round-presents an opportunity for countries to reap the benefits of trade liberalization. Unfortunately, a number of misconceptions about the likely impact of trade reforms has, in part, impeded more rapid progress toward completion of the Round. This paper addresses some of the most egregious of these misconceptions and presents results from IMF research that sheds light on these issues. In particular, this paper argues that: (i) developing countries have much to gain from their own trade liberalization; (ii) preference erosion could be significant for some countries, but it is not a justification for postponing tariff reductions; (iii) tariffs applied against agricultural products in rich countries actually harm developing countries more than subsidies; and (iv) a disproportionate share of agricultural subsidies in rich countries goes to large wealthy farmers.
Description based on print version record.
There are no comments on this title.