The Art of Making Everybody Happy [electronic resource] : How to Prevent a Secession / Michel Le Breton.

By: Le Breton, MichelContributor(s): Weber, ShlomoMaterial type: TextTextSeries: IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 01/176Publication details: Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 2001Description: 1 online resource (36 p.)ISBN: 1451858817 :ISSN: 1018-5941Subject(s): Budget Constraint | Compensation | Fiscal Capacity | Fiscal Federalism | Partial Equalization | Subsidies | GermanyAdditional physical formats: Print Version:: The Art of Making Everybody Happy : How to Prevent a SecessionOnline resources: IMF e-Library | IMF Book Store Abstract: In this paper we consider a model of the country with heterogeneous population and examine compensation schemes that may prevent a threat of secession by dissatisfied regions. We show that horizontal imbalances are combatable with secession-proof compensation schemes that entail a degree of partial equalization: the disadvantageous regions should be subsidized but the burden on advantageous regions should not be too excessive. In the case of uniform distribution, we establish the 50-percent compensation rule for disadvantageous regions. Thus, we argue for a limited gap reduction between advantageous and disadvantageous regions and show that neither laissez faire nor Rawlsian allocation is secession-proof.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

In this paper we consider a model of the country with heterogeneous population and examine compensation schemes that may prevent a threat of secession by dissatisfied regions. We show that horizontal imbalances are combatable with secession-proof compensation schemes that entail a degree of partial equalization: the disadvantageous regions should be subsidized but the burden on advantageous regions should not be too excessive. In the case of uniform distribution, we establish the 50-percent compensation rule for disadvantageous regions. Thus, we argue for a limited gap reduction between advantageous and disadvantageous regions and show that neither laissez faire nor Rawlsian allocation is secession-proof.

Description based on print version record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha