Sovereign Natural Disaster Insurance for Developing Countries [electronic resource] : A Paradigm Shift in Catastrophe Risk Financing / Ghesquiere, Francis
Material type: TextPublication details: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, 2007Description: 1 online resource (26 p.)Subject(s): Banks and Banking Reform | Debt Markets | Developing Countries | Environment | Expenditures | Finance and Financial Sector Development | Hazard Risk Management | Insurance | Insurance and Risk Mitigation | Long-term resource | Natural Disaster | Natural Disasters | Private investors | Public investment | Risk Management | Safety Net | Tax | Urban DevelopmentAdditional physical formats: Ghesquiere, Francis.: Sovereign Natural Disaster Insurance for Developing Countries.Online resources: Click here to access online Abstract: Economic theory suggests that countries should ignore uncertainty for public investment and behave as if indifferent to risk because they can pool risks to a much greater extent than private investors can. This paper discusses the general economic theory in the case of developing countries. The analysis identifies several cases where the government's risk-neutral assumption does not hold, thus making rational the use of ex ante risk financing instruments, including sovereign insurance. The paper discusses the optimal level of sovereign insurance. It argues that, because sovereign insurance is usually more expensive than post-disaster financing, it should mainly cover immediate needs, while long-term expenditures should be financed through post-disaster financing (including ex post borrowing and tax increases). In other words, sovereign insurance should not aim at financing the long-term resource gap, but only the short-term liquidity need.Economic theory suggests that countries should ignore uncertainty for public investment and behave as if indifferent to risk because they can pool risks to a much greater extent than private investors can. This paper discusses the general economic theory in the case of developing countries. The analysis identifies several cases where the government's risk-neutral assumption does not hold, thus making rational the use of ex ante risk financing instruments, including sovereign insurance. The paper discusses the optimal level of sovereign insurance. It argues that, because sovereign insurance is usually more expensive than post-disaster financing, it should mainly cover immediate needs, while long-term expenditures should be financed through post-disaster financing (including ex post borrowing and tax increases). In other words, sovereign insurance should not aim at financing the long-term resource gap, but only the short-term liquidity need.
There are no comments on this title.