Leading Indicators of Banking Crises Was Asia Different?. [electronic resource] :
- Washington, D.C. : International Monetary Fund, 1998.
- 1 online resource (32 p.)
- IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 98/91 .
- IMF Working Papers; Working Paper ; No. 98/91 .
This paper examines episodes of the banking system distress and crisis in a large sample of countries. The empirical results identify several macroeconomic and financial variables as useful leading indicators. The main macroeconomic indicators were of limited value in predicting the Asian crises; the best warning signs were proxies for the vulnerability of the banking and corporate sector. Full-blown banking crises are shown to be more associated with external developments, and domestic variables are the main leading indicators of severe but contained banking distress.
1451951744 : 15.00 USD
1018-5941
10.5089/9781451951745.001 doi
Banking Crises
Banking Sector
Banking System Distress
Banking System
Banking
Leading Indicators
East Asia
Indonesia
Korea, Republic of
Mexico
Philippines
Thailand
This paper examines episodes of the banking system distress and crisis in a large sample of countries. The empirical results identify several macroeconomic and financial variables as useful leading indicators. The main macroeconomic indicators were of limited value in predicting the Asian crises; the best warning signs were proxies for the vulnerability of the banking and corporate sector. Full-blown banking crises are shown to be more associated with external developments, and domestic variables are the main leading indicators of severe but contained banking distress.
1451951744 : 15.00 USD
1018-5941
10.5089/9781451951745.001 doi
Banking Crises
Banking Sector
Banking System Distress
Banking System
Banking
Leading Indicators
East Asia
Indonesia
Korea, Republic of
Mexico
Philippines
Thailand